By mpethybridge:
Using my DB as an illustration for how people ought to go about this analysis to determine their profitability in responding to 3-bets:
1. Note your Fold to 3-bet%:
 |
(I'm a calling station, what can I say?)
2. Note your overall performance facing a 3-bet:
 |
3. Note your win rate when 4 betting:
 |
4. Note your win rate when calling a 3-bet:
 |
5. Note your win rate when you are NOT slow playing AA or KK by filtering them out--I call this my unsubsidized 3-bet calling win rate:
 |
The standard for whether you are leaking playing back against 3-bets is NOT making a profit on the hand. If you fold, you lose 3 or 3.5 bb. Therefore, any strategy which yields you less of a loss than folding is a +EV strategy.
In PT this is a loss rate of -1.5 to -1.75ptBB/hand; in HEM, it is a loss rate of -300 to -350 bb/100.
Take a look through your databases in this way, as most of the micro players I have been doing DB analyses for are definitely leaking in one or more of these areas, as knn05 says is likely the case.
In PT this is a loss rate of -1.5 to -1.75ptBB/hand; in HEM, it is a loss rate of -300 to -350 bb/100.
Take a look through your databases in this way, as most of the micro players I have been doing DB analyses for are definitely leaking in one or more of these areas, as knn05 says is likely the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment